Posted on April 24, 2014
Fukuyama argues that ‘the most significant threat posed by contemporary biotechnology is the possibility that it will alter human nature and thereby move us into a “posthuman” stage of history’. I argue, by contrast, that anthropology has already reached a posthuman stage of intellectual development. The attribution of agency to things has dehumanised anthropology and contributed to the creation of a new multidisciplinary paradigm: posthuman cultural economy, an approach that Fukuyama, along with Appadurai and Callon, has done much to popularise. This paradigm takes the point of view of the superprime financial trader rather than that of the subprime precariat. Anthropology entered this posthuman stage in the late 1970s and early 1980s but there are some positive signs of change.
Enquiries: [email protected], 012 420 4895
Normal 0 false false false EN-ZA X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}Copyright © University of Pretoria 2025. All rights reserved.
Get Social With Us
Download the UP Mobile App