Symposium delegates call for national land reform dialogue
26 April 2017

 

The issue of land reform in South Africa was the topic of discussion at a symposium on land, heritage and human rights, during which delegates called for urgent dialogue. The symposium, held on 19 April 2017, was co-organised by the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria, the Community Law Centre at the Kara Heritage Institute and the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (George Campus). Financial support was received from the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa. In the light of recent divergent and often divisive stances adopted by political parties towards addressing the matter, the discussion of this topic was very timely. The demand for land by the majority of South Africans and the slow pace of delivery is increasingly threatening our foundation of human rights and democracy in South Africa.

One of the speakers, Prof Bongani Majola, Chair of the South African Human Rights Commission, expressed the opinion that a human rights approach to land redistribution, grounded in the effective implementation of Section 25 of the 1996 Constitution of South Africa, can still guarantee a life of dignity, equality and freedom for all South Africans. Prof Mathole Motshekga, Chair of the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Justice and Correctional Services, agreed with this sentiment and added that Parliament has not done enough to effectively make use of the possibilities for adopting enabling legislation, as allowed for under Section 25 of the Constitution.

Prof Bongani Majola, Chairperson of the South African Human Rights Commission

Section 25 of the Constitution guarantees the right to property, but not without limitations. It has increasingly come under attack by many, and Prof Motshekga pointed out that as far as the ANC’s position is concerned, the matter will be further deliberated upon during its imminent policy conference.

Professor Quinton Johnson from the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU), who convened the one-day symposium for academics, students, civil society groups and state representatives, introduced the dialogue as a vital engagement about land for the restoration of our dignity, the reclamation of our heritage and the advancement of our human rights. He further urged that radical reform must be driven within the rational framework of our Constitution. Advocate Leks Makua from the Johannesburg Bar identified several factors that must be addressed in order to accelerate the process and Judge Johann van der Westhuizen, Inspecting Judge of the Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional Services, chaired and facilitated the interactions of the symposium panel. The panellists expressed different thought-provoking views on Section 25 of the Constitution in addressing the question: ‘What legal reforms are needed for an effective and timely redistribution of land in South Africa?’ This included positions on whether we should embrace the principle of expropriation of land without compensation.

Ambassador Marisa Gerards from the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa

Prof Majola made it clear that payment of compensation for expropriated land is required by both the South African Constitution and its obligations under international law. It would be difficult to foresee a situation where compensation is excluded without also ousting the courts’ jurisdiction on the issue. Judge van der Westhuizen cautioned that the principle of the rule of law, which is a cornerstone of our democracy, should not be compromised.

Following an intensive and lively discussion on land reform, it emerged that Section 25 in itself is not an impediment to land reform. Those who contend that Section 25 is the main obstacle to equitable land distribution often do so because they do not pay close attention to, or misinterpret this provision. There was general agreement that more needs to be done to educate South Africans about their rights in general, and in particular about the provisions of Section 25 of the Constitution.

Several speakers pointed out that Section 25 does not guarantee an absolute right to property, but allows expropriation in the public interest, provided that just and equitable compensation is paid. To establish compensation, an equitable balance has to be struck between the public interest in expropriation and the interests of those affected. Even if Section 25 requires that compensation be paid, it does not require adherence to the willing buyer, willing seller principle, or consideration of additional factors, such as property use and the history of its acquisition in the process.

Prof Quinton Johnson (Principal of the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (George Campus))

Delegates noted the following:

First

Existing land reform legislation is not effectively implemented. The Land Claims Commissions and    Land Claims Court, set up under the Restitution of Land Rights Act of 1994, have not been effective agents for land restitution. Unnecessary bureaucratic bungling, significant corruption, limited expert skills exacerbated by cadre deployment, together with the reality that these institutions have to be made more accessible and representative, are some of the challenges that must be addressed.

Second

The possibility of adopting further enabling legislation to accelerate land reform is not being used, even though Section 25(8) of the Constitution specifically indicates that this can be done.

Third

The possibility of repealing existing legislation inconsistent with or hampering land reform is not being pursued.

Fourth

There is a need for national legislation on expropriation. The Expropriation Bill, which is currently before Parliament, was introduced late and was processed without urgency.  We should also consider the possibility of effecting appropriate amendments to the 1975 Expropriation Act.

Fifth

There should be improved communication and coordination between various government departments. The location of relevant land reform mandates and competencies are currently spread across several departments and should be better aligned to accelerate the pace of the process.

It is clear that the issue of land reform is urgent. We need a Land and Economy CODESA, to radically address poverty, inequality and unemployment in order to restore our dignity, strengthen our economy and advance our democracy.

 

For more information, please contact:

Prof Frans Viljoen
Director: Centre for Human Rights
University of Pretoria
Tel: (012) 420 3228
Email: frans.viljoen@up.ac.za
www.chr.up.ac.za
 
 

 

- Author Centre for Human Rights
Share this page
Last edited by Ansa HeylEdit
Prof Bongani Majola, Chairperson of the South African Human Rights Commission